No upfront fees. You pay only after removal. How it works

Guide · Removal Guide

How to remove content from Reddit.

Five routes, one decision tree. Start with who owns the content, then match the problem to the route that can actually fix it.

  • Beginner
  • 8 min read
  • Sourced

The short version

  • You can delete your own posts and comments yourself. You cannot delete other people's.

    01
  • There are five routes: the author, community moderators, Reddit administrators, legal requests and copyright. Each has its own test.

    02
  • Civil, truthful criticism is usually not removable. Rule-breaking content often is.

    03
  • Evidence comes first: permalinks, dated screenshots and the exact rule that is broken.

    04
  • Removed content keeps its address. It shows a removal notice rather than a "not found" page.

    05
01

Start here: is the content yours?

If you posted it, you can delete it yourself. Open your profile, find the post or comment, use its three-dot menu and choose Delete. Deleting removes it from public view. Be careful with third-party "mass delete" tools: Reddit warns that they are not officially supported and may not work as intended.

Deleting your own post does not delete other people's comments on it, which belong to their authors, and it does not remove copies, quotes or screenshots elsewhere.

02

If someone else posted it: the five routes

  • Ask the author to delete it. Sometimes possible, often not wise if the relationship is hostile.
  • Moderators. Each community's volunteer moderators can remove content that breaks that community's rules. They act under Reddit's Moderator Code of Conduct.
  • Reddit administrators. They remove content that breaks the Reddit Rules (harassment, personal information, impersonation and others) and can suspend accounts.
  • Legal requests. Court orders, government requests and private-party demands. Reddit reviews each against the Reddit Rules first and may geo-block content that breaks local law.
  • Copyright. A DMCA notice for works you own.
03

Match the problem to the route

  • Your address, phone number or private documents were posted: report under Rule 3, then use Google's personal information removal.
  • You are being targeted, threatened or followed across communities: Rule 1 (harassment), documented as a pattern.
  • An account or community is pretending to be you or your company: Rule 5 (authenticity).
  • Someone copied your photos, writing or video: DMCA notice.
  • Someone states false facts about you or your business: report under the Rules if they apply, and keep evidence for a lawyer.
  • It is simply negative, critical or embarrassing but civil and truthful: usually not removable. A measured public reply is the better tool.
04

Before you report anything

  • Copy the permalink of each post and comment, not just the link to the post.
  • Take dated screenshots: content can be edited or deleted within hours.
  • Write down which rule you think is broken, and the exact lines that break it.
  • Do not reply or argue. It can push the content up and gives people more to quote.
05

What to expect

Reddit does not publish typical response times. Its transparency report does show that admins act on a minority of reports: of 16,070,307 user reports in the second half of 2024, removal action followed on 9.3%. Reports fail mostly because they are duplicates or the content is judged non-violating. Reports that cite the specific rule and show the content do better.

06

When a specialist helps

When you are not sure which route applies, when the content is spread over many URLs, when you have already reported and been ignored, or when the stakes are high enough that one badly framed report could do damage. A specialist does not have a back door; they save you from the wrong route and build a stronger case.

07

How Reddit's two layers of moderation fit together

Reddit is not moderated from one place. Every community has its own volunteer moderators who write and enforce that community's rules, and Reddit's own staff, called administrators or admins, enforce the sitewide Reddit Rules across the whole platform. A post can break one set of rules without breaking the other, and it is worth knowing which one you are dealing with before you report anything.

Moderators are bound by Reddit's Moderator Code of Conduct, which Reddit introduced in 2022 and updated in 2024. It sets expectations for how moderators use their tools and makes clear that moderation tools, including bots and third-party apps, must not be used in ways that break the Reddit Rules. Reddit says it prefers to resolve problems through discussion first, but it may take action against moderators or communities that do not follow the code.

For anyone trying to have content removed, that means there are usually two doors. Moderators can act quickly on content that breaks their community's own rules. Administrators act on content that breaks the Reddit Rules, which covers things such as harassment, sharing personal information and impersonation. The guide on the Reddit Rules explains the difference in more detail.

08

How reporting works

Every post and comment has a report option. A report can reach the community's moderators, Reddit's administrators, or both, depending on what you say is wrong. Reddit also has a separate reporting form on its site for issues that need more space to explain, such as a problem affecting many items or a report that needs attachments.

Third-party explainers and community guidance say that moderators cannot see who submitted an individual report. Reddit's own help pages are the place to confirm that, but it is consistent with how people describe the system. Whichever way it works, you should avoid sharing details of your report with the person you are reporting.

What makes a report easier to act on

  • One item per report, with its own permalink.
  • The name of the rule, and the exact words or image that break it.
  • A short, factual explanation in two or three sentences.
  • Dated screenshots, in case the content is edited or deleted.
  • No insults, threats or demands. Reviewers are people working through a long queue.
09

Removed, deleted, filtered: reading what Reddit shows you

Reddit does not delete pages or show a "page not found" error for removed content. The address still opens, and a notice takes the place of the original text. A post removed by a community's moderators can show as removed by the moderators. Content removed by Reddit's automated filters, for example as suspected spam, can show as removed by Reddit's filters. Content removed after a legal process can show as removed by Reddit's legal team. A banned community shows a banned notice, and a banned user's profile stays online with the username shown as "[deleted]".

The word "[deleted]" has two meanings worth keeping apart. On a post or comment it usually means the author deleted it. On a profile it is what you see when an account is deleted or banned. Knowing which one you are looking at tells you who acted and what the next step is.

Automated filters sometimes catch content by mistake. If your own post was removed by a filter, the usual advice from community guides is to message the moderators and ask them to review it. If someone else's post was removed and you want the decision to stay, there is nothing you need to do.

10

What deleting your own content does, and does not, do

You can delete your own posts and comments yourself. Deleting removes them from public view. Some consumer guides point out that deleted content may still exist in Reddit's systems, and that archives, scrapers and screenshots may hold copies, so deletion is not a guarantee that nothing remains anywhere.

Deleting your account is different from deleting your content. In general, deleting an account leaves your posts and comments visible, attributed to "[deleted]". If you want your content gone, delete it first, one item at a time or with a bulk tool, and delete the account afterwards. Deleting an account also does not remove other people's comments on your posts, because those belong to their authors.

11

When a legal route is the right one

Some problems do not fit the rules at all. A person may want a court order enforced, a government body may send a request, or a copyright owner may need a formal notice. Reddit reviews each of these. It looks first at whether the content breaks the Reddit Rules, and in some cases it restricts content in one country rather than removing it everywhere.

Legal routes are slower and more formal than a rules-based report, and they are the right choice only when the rules do not apply. If you are not sure, the guide on legal references explains how courts and platforms treat this kind of content, and the DMCA guide covers copyright.

Your action plan

  1. 1

    Capture the evidence

    Save the permalink of every post and comment, with dated screenshots. Content can be edited or deleted within hours.

  2. 2

    Decide whose content it is

    Yours: delete it. Someone else's: go to the route that matches the problem.

  3. 3

    Choose the route

    Rule-breaking content goes to moderators or Reddit. Copied work goes through a DMCA notice. Court orders and government requests are handled as legal requests.

  4. 4

    File one precise report

    Name the rule, quote the lines that break it and link each item. Short and specific beats long and angry.

  5. 5

    Record the outcome

    Note the date and what Reddit shows afterwards. A removal notice, a "no action" reply and silence each lead to a different next step.

  6. 6

    Check search results

    Search engines update on their own schedule. If the page still appears, ask the search engine to refresh it once the source is gone.

Evidence checklist

  • The permalink of each post and each comment, not just the post link
  • Dated screenshots showing username, community and full text
  • The rule you think is broken, and the exact lines that break it
  • Whether the content names you, your business or someone else
  • Every earlier report you made and any reply you received
  • A note of where the content appears in search results

Common mistakes

  • Replying or arguing first

    A reply can push a post up, add words to the record and give people more to quote.

  • Reporting the same thing many times

    Repeated reports from several accounts look like misuse of the report tool. One clear report is stronger.

  • Calling criticism "defamation"

    Reviewers apply rules, and courts separate opinion from false statements of fact. Name the rule, not the feeling.

The rulebook

Reddit rules that apply.

  • Rule 1

    Remember the human

    No harassment, bullying or threats of violence; no attacking marginalised or vulnerable groups. Communities and users that incite violence or promote hate based on identity or vulnerability can be banned.

  • Rule 2

    Abide by community rules

    Follow each community's own rules, and do not spam or use disruptive behaviour, including content manipulation, that interferes with communities.

  • Rule 3

    Respect the privacy of others

    Instigating harassment, for example by revealing someone's personal or confidential information, is not allowed. Never post or threaten to post intimate or sexually explicit media of someone without consent.

  • Rule 5

    Be authentic

    You do not have to use your real name, but you must not intentionally mislead others or impersonate an individual or entity in a deceptive manner.

  • Rule 7

    Keep it legal

    Do not post illegal content or solicit or facilitate illegal or prohibited transactions.

Paraphrased from the official Reddit Rules. Moderators also enforce each community's own rules, under Reddit's Moderator Code of Conduct.

By the numbers

What the data shows.

  • 16.07M

    user reports in six months

    Reddit received 16,070,307 reports of possible Rules violations. Admins took removal action on 9.3% of them.

    Source: Reddit Transparency Report · July to December 2024

  • ~6 billion

    pieces of content posted in six months

    Moderators and admins removed 2.66% of it: 1.42% by moderators and 1.24% by admins.

    Source: Reddit Transparency Report · July to December 2024

Legal background

The law behind it.

Statute · United States · 1996

47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act)

Section 230(c)(1) provides that no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of information provided by another. In practice, the person who wrote a defamatory comment can be sued; the platform hosting it generally cannot.

Why it matters here: This is why legal threats against Reddit itself rarely succeed, and why removal is normally pursued through Reddit's own Rules and reporting channels.

Court case · California Supreme Court · 2018

Hassell v. Bird

5 Cal.5th 522 (2018)

A law firm won a default judgment over defamatory reviews and a court order directing Yelp to remove them. In a 4 to 3 decision the California Supreme Court held that Section 230 prevented the court from ordering Yelp to remove the reviews; the judgment against the reviewer stood.

Why it matters here: Even a court win against the author may not compel a platform to delete the content. That is why a platform's own rules and reporting process matter so much.

Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · 2009

Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc.

570 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2009)

An ex-boyfriend posted fake profiles of Cecilia Barnes. Yahoo promised to take them down and did not. The Ninth Circuit held that Section 230 barred a negligence claim, but allowed a promissory-estoppel claim to go forward because Yahoo had made a specific promise to remove the content.

Why it matters here: Platforms are shielded from claims about what users post, but a clear promise to remove content can create separate obligations. Keep a record of every reply you receive from a platform.

Real public cases

How it has played out.

Public case · 2015 · not a client of ours

2015: a car company sues a customer who called it a scam, then settles

Type
Defamation claim over negative online posts
Where
Online forums, including Reddit
What happened
Frederic Lambert wrote online that Saleen Automotive was a scam and compared it to a Ponzi scheme. The company sued him for defamation.
What was done
The case settled in July 2015. Lambert agreed to remove his posts and to make no further defamatory comments. Other terms were not disclosed.
Outcome
The posts were removed by agreement, after a lawsuit.
What it teaches
Sustained, specific accusations of fraud can lead to legal action, and a settlement can include removal. It is also the costly route. Rule-based reports are usually faster for content that breaks a rule.

Public case · 2018 · not a client of ours

2018: a psychiatrist sues Reddit and anonymous commenters over a long discussion

Type
Lawsuit over negative comments about a professional
Where
Reddit, filed in Florida
What happened
A Florida psychiatrist sued Reddit and anonymous users over a discussion of more than 160 comments warning people to stay away from his practice. He asked for the users to be identified and the comments removed.
What was done
He filed suit in January 2018. The news report describing the filing does not say how the case ended, and we have not verified an outcome.
Outcome
Filed. The reported source gives no outcome.
What it teaches
Suing a platform over what users wrote runs into Section 230, and unmasking commenters requires a substantial legal showing. A suit also draws more attention to the discussion.

Questions

Questions answered.

Can I delete a post someone else wrote?

No. Only the author, the community's moderators and Reddit can remove it. What you can do is report it, and the route that applies depends on what the content is.

Does deleting my account remove my posts?

In general, no. Posts and comments tend to stay visible with the username shown as "[deleted]". To take content down, delete the individual posts and comments first.

How long does a removal take?

Reddit does not publish typical response times. It depends on the route, the community and the volume of reports, so any promised timeframe should be treated with care.

What if a removed post still shows in Google?

Reddit removing a post does not instantly update search engines. They refresh on their own schedule, and most have a process for asking them to re-check a page.

Is it worth hiring a specialist?

It can be when you are unsure which route applies, when many URLs are involved, when you have already reported and been ignored, or when the stakes are high. For one clear rule-breaking post, reporting it yourself is a reasonable start.