No upfront fees. You pay only after removal. How it works

Content

Reddit post and thread removal.

A post is where it starts. A thread is the post plus every reply under it. We work out why it can come down, then build the request that reaches the right reviewer.

Get it deleted Submit URL

No upfront fees. You pay only after removal.

This is for you if

Sound familiar?

  • 01

    A post names you, your company or your staff.

  • 02

    A full discussion about you or your business ranks in Google.

  • 03

    A post or its replies share an address, phone number, photo or document that should be private.

  • 04

    The original post was deleted but reposts or quotes keep the topic alive.

How Reddit handles this

What actually decides the outcome.

01

Post or thread: what you are actually removing

A post is the original submission. A thread is the post plus every comment under it. Removing the post takes the discussion out of public view, because comments hang from it. But if the post has already been deleted and the problem lives in the comments, or the discussion has been cross-posted or quoted elsewhere, a request aimed only at the original post is not enough.

That is why the first step is to map the whole footprint: the post, the problem replies, the poster, the community and every cross-post.

02

Who can take it down

The author can delete their own post. The community's moderators can remove it if it breaks the community's rules, and they are expected to act within Reddit's Moderator Code of Conduct. Reddit's administrators can remove it for breaking the Reddit Rules, and may also act on the account. Reddit's transparency report notes that volunteer moderators perform the majority of community moderation actions.

03

Why most reports go nowhere

Reddit received 16,070,307 user reports in the second half of 2024 and took removal action on 9.3% of them. A report is more likely to succeed when it quotes the specific rule, shows the exact content, and is filed once to the right place. A post that is simply critical, even harsh, but civil and not making false factual claims about a named person, is usually outside what a reviewer can act on.

How we handle it

Our route, step by step.

  1. 01

    Map the post and the thread

    We record the post, the problem replies, the poster, the subreddit and any cross-posts, with dates and screenshots, because content can be edited or deleted.

  2. 02

    Find the strongest ground

    Reviewers look for a specific rule. Privacy exposure, impersonation, harassment, copyright or a rule breach decides whether the whole thread can be pursued or only parts of it.

  3. 03

    Choose the route

    Report to Reddit, contact community moderators, use the privacy or legal channels, or ask the author to delete it where that is realistic.

  4. 04

    Pursue and verify

    A short, specific, evidenced request, then we track the decision and check that the content and its cached copies are actually gone.

Every step is logged.

Each action on your case is recorded with its date. You can read the log at any time in your client portal, and reply to us there.

The rulebook

Reddit rules that apply.

A post is removed only if it breaks a rule. These are the three rules we most often build a post report on.

  • Rule 1

    Remember the human

    A post that targets a named person with abuse, threats or a call to pile on engages this rule. A post that simply criticises a business or an opinion usually does not.

  • Rule 3

    Respect the privacy of others

    If a post shares your address, phone number, workplace or documents, this is usually the clearest basis for asking a reviewer to act. Everything else has to be argued on other rules.

  • Rule 5

    Be authentic

    Posts that pretend to come from you or your company, or that invent a person or evidence, engage this rule. Ordinary negative reviews written by real people do not.

Paraphrased from the official Reddit Rules. Moderators also enforce each community's own rules, under Reddit's Moderator Code of Conduct.

By the numbers

What the data shows.

Reddit's own reporting shows how much content is flagged, and how much of it Reddit acts on.

  • 16.07M

    user reports in six months

    Reddit received 16,070,307 reports of possible Rules violations. Admins took removal action on 9.3% of them.

    Source: Reddit Transparency Report · July to December 2024

  • ~6 billion

    pieces of content posted in six months

    Moderators and admins removed 2.66% of it: 1.42% by moderators and 1.24% by admins.

    Source: Reddit Transparency Report · July to December 2024

Legal background

The law behind it.

Reddit is generally not treated as the author of what its users post. That is why the route to removal is Reddit's own rules, not a court order against Reddit.

Statute · United States · 1996

47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act)

Section 230(c)(1) provides that no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of information provided by another. In practice, the person who wrote a defamatory comment can be sued; the platform hosting it generally cannot.

Why it matters here: This is why legal threats against Reddit itself rarely succeed, and why removal is normally pursued through Reddit's own Rules and reporting channels.

Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · 1997

Zeran v. America Online, Inc.

129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997)

After anonymous posts attached Kenneth Zeran's phone number to offensive T-shirt ads, he notified AOL but the posts stayed up. The Fourth Circuit held that Section 230 bars liability for third-party content even after the platform is notified.

Why it matters here: The leading early ruling on platform immunity. It explains why "notify the site and sue if they refuse" is not a reliable strategy in the United States.

Real public cases

How it has played out.

A public example of Reddit reviewing a specific post and acting on it.

Public case · 2024 · not a client of ours

2024: a law firm asks Reddit to remove employer reviews; Reddit pushes back

Type
Defamation demand over negative experiences
Where
A popular job-posting subreddit
What happened
A law firm in the Philippines, acting for a local business, identified one post and three comments describing negative experiences with a prospective employer. The request also sought disclosure of user information.
What was done
Reddit reviewed the content against the Reddit Rules, found no violation, and pushed back on the request, including the request for user information.
Outcome
The content stayed up and no user information was disclosed.
What it teaches
Truthful or opinion-based accounts of a real experience, written civilly, are hard to remove. A removal attempt should start from a Rules violation, not from the fact that the content is unwelcome.

Public case · 2015 · not a client of ours

2015: a car company sues a customer who called it a scam, then settles

Type
Defamation claim over negative online posts
Where
Online forums, including Reddit
What happened
Frederic Lambert wrote online that Saleen Automotive was a scam and compared it to a Ponzi scheme. The company sued him for defamation.
What was done
The case settled in July 2015. Lambert agreed to remove his posts and to make no further defamatory comments. Other terms were not disclosed.
Outcome
The posts were removed by agreement, after a lawsuit.
What it teaches
Sustained, specific accusations of fraud can lead to legal action, and a settlement can include removal. It is also the costly route. Rule-based reports are usually faster for content that breaks a rule.

The outcome

What success looks like.

  • 1

    The post shows a removal notice

    The link still opens, but the post reads "[removed]", "Removed by moderator", "Removed by Reddit's filters" or "Removed by legal team" instead of the original text.

  • 2

    Search results catch up

    Google and other search engines refresh on their own schedule. Until they do, a search snippet can still show the old wording. The page itself no longer does.

  • 3

    You hear from us first

    We check the post when we report it and again after the decision, and the outcome is recorded on your case in the client portal.

Before you do anything

Mistakes that make it harder.

  • Arguing that the post is "unfair"

    Reviewers apply rules, not opinions. A report has to name the rule the post breaks and show where.

  • Replying to the post first

    A reply can push the post up, add your own words to the record and give the poster something to screenshot.

  • Reporting it many times

    Repeat reports from several accounts look like abuse of the report tool. One clear report is stronger.

  • Deleting your own evidence

    Dates, usernames and screenshots are what the review rests on. Keep everything until the case is closed.

While we work

You see every step.

Sign in with a one-time code sent to your email. Follow the case, reply to us, add links and evidence, and read your invoice there. The invoice is issued only after removal.

How it works

What we need

Send us this.

  • The post URL and any cross-post URLs
  • Screenshots with dates (posts can be edited)
  • The exact lines or details causing harm
  • Proof where claims are false or details are private, and your relationship to the post

Case studies

Related case studies.

Questions

About reddit post removal.

What is the difference between a Reddit post and a thread?

A post is the original submission. A thread is that post plus all the comments under it. Removing the post normally removes the thread with it. If only some replies are the problem, we target those specifically.

How fast can a Reddit post come down?

A clear privacy or safety violation can be actioned quickly. Disputed reputation cases take longer and may need more than one submission.

Client feedback

What clients say.

  • Reddit Post Removal

    “Had a Reddit post that was creating a serious problem for our business. The team explained the process clearly, handled the communication professionally, and kept us updated throughout. The post was ultimately removed, and the whole experience was much more organized than I expected.”

    Daniel M. · Toronto, Canada

  • Old Reddit Thread

    “This was an old Reddit thread that had continued showing up whenever my name was searched. The team took the time to understand the situation before starting. Their communication was professional, and I was kept informed at every stage.”

    James T. · New York, United States

  • Comment & Thread Removal

    “I had both a Reddit thread and several comments I wanted addressed. The team reviewed the URLs, explained the situation, and handled the process professionally. Communication was excellent throughout.”

    Oliver H. · Manchester, United Kingdom

Client reviews, shared with permission.

Related

Related Reddit services.

All Reddit removal services Communities we work in Legal references