No upfront fees. You pay only after removal. How it works
Reputation
When a post breaks out, the first day matters. Speed helps, but panic makes it worse.
No upfront fees. You pay only after removal.
This is for you if
A post about you or your company is trending.
Media or influencers are picking it up.
Private details or false claims are being amplified.
You need a plan today, not next week.
How Reddit handles this
When a post breaks out, three things matter at once. Report anything that breaks the Reddit Rules immediately (personal information, harassment, impersonation, false claims about named people). Preserve evidence, because posts get edited and deleted. And decide who will speak for you, if anyone, and from which account.
Do not argue in the comments, and do not use alternate accounts to defend yourself. Replying can push the post up and hands people more to quote, and undisclosed accounts are a serious risk if discovered. A single factual reply from an identified account, written calmly, often does more than a flood of reports.
The 2013 Boston Marathon misidentification is the clearest example of how fast a false claim about a private person can spread on Reddit, and of the harm it does. Reddit's general manager apologised publicly for the "witch hunts". Reports that are specific, evidenced and filed early are the ones reviewers can act on.
How we handle it
Within hours: what is being said, where, by whom, and what breaks a rule.
Privacy, harassment, impersonation and false claims are reported immediately with evidence.
Whether to respond, who should, and what to say. Rule-compliant content will not be removed.
Watching for cross-posts, new posts and off-Reddit spread.
Each action on your case is recorded with its date. You can read the log at any time in your client portal, and reply to us there.
The rulebook
When a story is spreading, speed matters, but only the posts that break a rule can be removed. These are the rules we check first.
When a post is spreading because of harassment or pile-ons, this rule can justify a fast report on the specific posts driving it. Reports about comments that are merely negative will not move.
A post that exposes private details spreads quickly and does real harm, so this rule is the basis for asking for urgent action on it.
A coordinated or fake-account campaign is a matter for this rule. We document the accounts and their patterns, and keep that separate from real people who are simply angry.
Paraphrased from the official Reddit Rules. Moderators also enforce each community's own rules, under Reddit's Moderator Code of Conduct.
By the numbers
Reddit's audience is large, and content there is picked up by search and by news quickly.
130.3M
daily active uniques
Reddit reports 514.6 million weekly active uniques, including 53.2 million daily in the United States.
Source: Reddit, Inc. Q2 2026 results (SEC Form 8-K) · Quarter ended June 30, 2026
Legal background
Public figures and private people are treated differently by courts, which affects how a serious claim is approached.
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · 1974
418 U.S. 323 (1974)
The Court held that states may let private individuals recover for defamation on a showing of fault, while limiting presumed and punitive damages unless actual malice is shown. It draws the line between public figures and private people.
Why it matters here: Whether you are a public figure changes how hard a defamation claim is. Founders and executives of well-known companies are often treated as public figures for related statements.
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · 2014
740 F.3d 1284 (9th Cir. 2014)
A blogger accused a financial firm and its principal of fraud in online posts and a jury awarded $2.5 million. The Ninth Circuit held that a blogger writing about a matter of public concern has the same First Amendment protection as traditional media, that a private-figure plaintiff must prove at least negligence, and that the jury had been instructed wrongly. The verdict was partly reversed.
Why it matters here: Anyone who posts online, not only journalists, gets the benefit of the fault and falsity requirements. A negative post is not defamatory merely because it is harsh or unwelcome.
Statute · England and Wales · 2013 and 2019
[2019] UKSC 27
Section 1 provides that a statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the claimant's reputation. In Lachaux the UK Supreme Court held that this requires proof of the actual impact of the words on reputation, not only their tendency. Section 5 gives website operators a defence for user posts if they follow the notice-and-takedown procedure in regulations made under the Act.
Why it matters here: A UK claimant must show real reputational harm, and the section 5 process is the formal route for asking a website operator to deal with a user's statement.
Real public cases
A documented public event. It is not one of our clients.
Public case · 2025 · not a client of ours
Public case · 2025 · not a client of ours
The outcome
The posts driving the story are reported first. As they are removed, they show removal notices, and there is less to link to.
One person on the case, with plain updates while the situation is moving.
Some content will stay because it is lawful. We tell you which, and what else can be done about it.
Before you do anything
Every reply is a new comment and another chance for the story to rise.
It removes your ability to show your side and can look like an admission.
Mass reports on lawful content lose credibility. Start with what breaks a rule.
While we work
Sign in with a one-time code sent to your email. Follow the case, reply to us, add links and evidence, and read your invoice there. The invoice is issued only after removal.
What we need
Case studies
Questions
Often yes, briefly and factually, from an account that identifies you. We advise before you post.
No one controls what trends. We can act on violations and reduce the fuel.
Client feedback
Business Reputation
“Reddit content had become a recurring issue for our business. I contacted the team after trying other options myself. They gave me a clear assessment, explained the process, and kept me updated instead of leaving me guessing.”
Robert S. · Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Client reviews, shared with permission.
Related
Know when Reddit talks about you, before it ranks.
Learn moreRemove a Reddit comment, reply or exchange.
Learn moreRemove a Reddit post, or delete the whole discussion under it.
Learn moreAll Reddit removal services Communities we work in Legal references