No upfront fees. You pay only after removal. How it works

Legal

Reddit DMCA and copyright removal.

Copyright is the most formal route on Reddit. It works when you own the work. The notice must be correct, because it is a legal statement.

No upfront fees. You pay only after removal.

This is for you if

Sound familiar?

  • 01

    Your photos, video or artwork were uploaded without permission.

  • 02

    Your written work or paid content was copied onto Reddit.

  • 03

    A leaked file or course is being shared.

  • 04

    You already sent a takedown that was ignored or rejected.

How Reddit handles this

What actually decides the outcome.

01

How DMCA works on Reddit

Reddit follows a notice-and-takedown process consistent with the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act. When it receives a valid notice, it removes the content identified and notifies the account holder where appropriate. Reddit's July to December 2024 report shows the system at scale: 54,110 notices, of which 40,527 (74%) were actioned in whole or in part, leading to 229,226 pieces of content being removed.

02

What a valid notice must contain

Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3), a notice needs the signature of someone authorised to act, identification of the copyrighted work, identification of the infringing material and where it is, the complainant's contact details, a statement of good-faith belief that the use is not authorised, and a statement, under penalty of perjury, that the notice is accurate and the sender is authorised. Reddit rejects incomplete notices, and so do the courts.

03

Why every notice gets checked first

A DMCA notice is a legal statement. Section 512(f) makes knowing material misrepresentation actionable, and in Lenz v. Universal Music the Ninth Circuit held that copyright owners must consider fair use before sending a takedown notice. Copyright also only protects original creative works you own or control. It cannot be used to remove criticism, opinion or facts, and Reddit's own report shows it rejecting trademark notices for exactly that kind of misuse.

How we handle it

Our route, step by step.

  1. 01

    Confirm ownership

    We check that you own or control the work and that the use is not covered by a defence.

  2. 02

    Prepare the notice

    A DMCA notice with the required statements, the original work and each infringing URL.

  3. 03

    File with Reddit

    Through Reddit's copyright process, to its designated agent.

  4. 04

    Handle the response

    If a counter-notice arrives, you decide whether to take the matter further. We explain what that means first.

Every step is logged.

Each action on your case is recorded with its date. You can read the log at any time in your client portal, and reply to us there.

The rulebook

Reddit rules that apply.

A DMCA notice is a legal process, and Reddit's rules on legal compliance sit alongside it.

  • Rule 7

    Keep it legal

    Posting material you do not own without permission can also break Reddit's rule on keeping things legal, on top of copyright law. The DMCA notice is the formal route, and it must be accurate to be accepted.

Paraphrased from the official Reddit Rules. Moderators also enforce each community's own rules, under Reddit's Moderator Code of Conduct.

By the numbers

What the data shows.

  • 74%

    of copyright takedown notices actioned

    Of 54,110 notices, 40,527 were actioned in whole or in part. The notices asked for 459,697 pieces of content to be removed; 229,226 were removed.

    Source: Reddit Transparency Report · July to December 2024

Legal background

The law behind it.

The DMCA sets out what a notice must say, what happens next and what a false notice risks. That is why accuracy matters here more than anywhere.

Statute · United States · 1998

17 U.S.C. § 512 (Digital Millennium Copyright Act)

Section 512(c) sets the notice-and-takedown system. A valid notice must identify the copyrighted work and the infringing material, give the complainant's contact details, and include a good-faith statement and a statement, under penalty of perjury, that the notice is accurate and the sender is authorised. Section 512(f) makes knowing material misrepresentation in a notice actionable.

Why it matters here: Copyright is the most formal and most reliable removal route, but only for works you own. It cannot be used to remove criticism or facts.

Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · 2015

Lenz v. Universal Music Corp.

801 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2015)

The Ninth Circuit held that copyright owners must consider fair use before sending a takedown notice. A notice sent without that consideration can support a misrepresentation claim under Section 512(f).

Why it matters here: A DMCA notice is a legal statement. Careless or pretextual notices carry real risk, so every notice should be checked before it is sent.

Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · 2004

Rossi v. Motion Picture Association of America

391 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir. 2004)

The MPAA sent a takedown notice to the host of a website that said it offered movie downloads. The site's owner argued that the MPAA never checked. The Ninth Circuit held that the "good faith belief" a sender needs is a subjective one, so the sender was not liable without actual knowledge that the claim was false.

Why it matters here: It sets a high bar for challenging a wrongful takedown notice. That is why a notice should be accurate to begin with, and why wrongful notices are hard to punish.

Real public cases

How it has played out.

A public case of a trademark claim on Reddit that did not succeed, which shows the difference between a valid claim and an unwelcome one.

Public case · 2024 · not a client of ours

2024: trademark notices used against reviews are rejected

Type
Trademark takedown used to suppress criticism
Where
Posts reviewing a consulting service
What happened
A company providing academic consulting services sent a large number of trademark takedown notices against posts that reviewed its service and asked whether it was good value, asserting "marketplace confusion".
What was done
Reddit reviewed them and determined the posts only used the trademark to discuss and criticise the brand, which does not violate its Trademark Policy.
Outcome
The content stayed up. Across the period Reddit rejected 596 invalid trademark notices.
What it teaches
Choosing the wrong legal tool (trademark for criticism, copyright for facts) fails. The correct basis for each problem matters more than how forcefully it is pushed.

Public case · 2015 · not a client of ours

2015: false DMCA notices cost the sender real money

Type
Abuse of the takedown process
Where
WordPress, N.D. Cal.
What happened
A UK journalist posted a press statement that had been given to him. A representative of the group that issued it sent false DMCA takedown notices, and the post was taken down.
What was done
WordPress owner Automattic and the journalist sued. The court entered a default judgment, finding a knowing material misrepresentation under 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), and awarded damages and attorney fees of more than $22,000.
Outcome
The sender was held liable. It was a default judgment, so the defendant did not contest it.
What it teaches
A DMCA notice is a legal statement made under penalty of perjury. Using one to remove something that is not infringement can be costly, which is why every notice is checked first.

The outcome

What success looks like.

  • 1

    The copied material is taken down

    The post is removed after Reddit accepts the notice, and shows a removal notice such as "Removed by legal team".

  • 2

    The poster may respond

    The poster can submit a counter-notice. If they do, there are fixed steps, and we explain each one before it happens.

  • 3

    Repeat infringers are flagged

    Notices are logged. If the same account keeps copying your work, earlier notices strengthen the next one.

Before you do anything

Mistakes that make it harder.

  • Sending a notice without checking ownership

    A notice that is wrong can expose you to a claim. Confirm you own the work first.

  • Claiming a whole page for one image

    A notice should name the specific material. Broad claims get rejected.

  • Using DMCA to silence criticism

    Criticism is not copyright infringement, and misusing the process can backfire.

While we work

You see every step.

Sign in with a one-time code sent to your email. Follow the case, reply to us, add links and evidence, and read your invoice there. The invoice is issued only after removal.

How it works

What we need

Send us this.

  • Proof of ownership: originals, dates, registrations
  • URLs of every infringing post
  • The copyright owner's legal name
  • Whether you have licensed the work anywhere

Questions

About reddit dmca / copyright removal.

Does DMCA apply to opinions or negative posts?

No. Copyright protects original creative works. It cannot be used to remove criticism or facts.

What is a counter-notice?

The poster can dispute the takedown. Then the content may be restored unless you file a court action. We explain this before you decide.